Globalisation Institute

Contact us

The Globalisation Institute
Suite 58
95 Wilton Road
London
SW1V 1BZ
United Kingdom

Tel +44 20 7222 3546
Press office +44 7834 001240
Fax +44 20 7043 2911
[email protected]

Donate

Help us expand our work by donating by credit card or PayPal

Donate Once Monthly

Currency

Amount

Currency

Amount

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Home Blog Geldof: fighting corruption fights poverty
Geldof: fighting corruption fights poverty PDF
Written by Alex Singleton   
Wednesday, 15 February 2006
Bob Geldof has joined up with Transparency International to head a study group looking at aid delivery and how to tackle corruption. He says: "It will not be possible to beat poverty without fighting corruption." He's right. The Make Poverty History campaign’s push on aid was not just for more aid, but for better aid, too. Better aid, of course, means different things to different people. Critics of old-style aid conditionality had a point that it was too inflexible and prescriptive, but one should not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Aid should still be safeguarded. After all voters and taxpayers are entitled to assurance that aid is utilised most effectively. Bad government is the enemy of good aid, but challenging recipient governments to meet minimum criteria will lead to improvements in governance being encouraged.

Greater emphasis needs to be made in using non-governmental delivery mechanisms. Channelling aid through the Kenyan government is not likely to deliver best results, given that a 20% of public funds are being siphoned off, and the country is ranked 122nd most corrupt out of 133 countries. Delivering help more locally, and greater use of non-governmental organisations, is surely a better approach. Conversely, donors have less to worry about when supporting well-governed developing countries, like Botswana and Ghana.