Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size   
You are here: Home arrow Blog arrow Cutting tariffs unilaterally
Skip to content

Contact us

Tel +44 (0)20 7222 3546
Fax +44 (0)20 7222 2363
Full contact details

RSS feed

Subscribe to this blog's feed



E-mail list

Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.

Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Six of the best

CIPE Development Blog
Johan Norberg
Philippe Legrain
Pienso
World Bank PSD
Trade Diversion

Blogroll

About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development

Cutting tariffs unilaterally PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 01 March 2005

There's one part of the discussion on globalization that is terribly difficult to understand. This is the reluctance of people to note that the argument in favour of free trade is not that it benefits others (whoever they may be), or our just our exporters, but that it benefits us via lower prices for imports. There is ever a reliance upon trying to show that opening up other people's markets to our goods is what it is all about. In fact it is the imports that are good for us, the exports simply being the price we pay for them. Even if everyone else in the world were not a free trading nation it would still benefit us to be one.

2005-02-28-unilateral.jpgTo those of a mercantilist mindset this is a troubling idea. It is one that does not actually seem to make sense. So it's good to see that Professor Patrick Minford has actually crunched the numbers for us in a forthcoming book, Should Britain leave the EU? An economic analysis of a troubled relationship. He looks at the entire relationship but one interesting number is that if Britain left the EU's tariff regime (currently a weighted average of about 1.4%) and were free traders, the UK economy would benefit by 2-3% of GDP, or twenty to thirty billion quid a year. Yes, the figures assume that our exports to the EU 24 would face EU tariffs.

This simple fact leads to a question, what exactly do our trade negotiators actually do for us? "If you open up your market to our goods, we'll open up ours to yours," seems to be what they say. But given the known benefits of no tariffs, what they are in fact stating is "If you persist in keeping your people poor by denying them our cheap products, we'll keep ours poor by denying them yours."

Not, on the face of it, a particularly logical piece of reasoning. In the absence of this perfect solution we shall have to keep staggering on, doing the best we can, with multilateral and bilateral deals (they are so much easier to sell politically), using the WTO for its powers as a court, enforcing those deals already signed up to. For, after all, some trade is better than no trade, low tariffs better than high.

Comments (0) >>
Write comment


Write the displayed characters