Keep up-to-date with the work of the GI with our e-mail bulletin every few weeks.
About Globalization
Adam Smith Institute
Atlantic Blog
Brian Micklethwait
Business & Economics
Cafe Hayek
Capital Spectator
Catallaxy
Center for Global Development
Chippla's weblog
Civitas Blog
Club for Growth
ConservativeHome
Daniel W. Drezner
David Smith
De Gustibus
EconLog
Franck's blog
Freedom Institute (Ireland)
From the Heartland
Gavin Sheridan
Global Growth Blog
Hillary Johnson
Hit and Run
Iain Dale
IndiaUncut
Institutional Economics
Knowledge Problem
Kurt Johnson
Market Center Blog
Mises Institute
Mutualist Blog
Natalie Solent
ODI
Owen Barder
Pharmopoly
Positive Externality
Private Sector Development
Radley Balko
Right to Create
Rip Mix Burn
Samizdata.net
Sobering thoughts
Social Affairs Unit
Spontaneous Order
TechDirt
The American Mind
The Commons Blog
The Liberal Order
The Welfare State We're In
Tim Worstall
Tom G. Palmer
Trade Diversion
Unrestricted Domain
Vaccines for Development
| Is Bristol a fair trade city? |
|
|
|
| Sunday, 17 April 2005 | |
|
The Financial Times wrote a rather dismissive piece in its Weekend Edition about Bristol's Fairtrade City status. They pointed out that Fairtrade status really amounted to very little, with the requirements to get the status being very low. Really, Fairtrade City status amounts to not much more than taxpayer marketing subsidies to Cafedirect plc, the coffee and tea producer listed on the London Stock Exchange, and other Fairtrade companies. Bristol might be a Fairtrade(TM) City, but it sure isn't a Fair Trade City. Only when the port in Bristol lets the products of other countries free access to United Kingdom will it be a Fair Trade City. That means no tariffs, no quotas, and no rules of origin. True fair trade has nothing to with counter-productive price-support schemes and everything to do with free and fair access to our economy. |